Australian Herald
AustralianHerald.com Saturday 5th July 2008 Edition 187/2008
  • More Australia News

  • Regional arms build-up by China, India could impact Australia: Study
  • Oz teens adopting American accents
  • Gas used to make TV screens more harmful to environment than coal
  • Students in Australia outsourcing homework to India
  • Jane McGrath preferred death to mastectomy
  • Kids' spines more suspectible to accidents than believed
  • Topless sunbaking area Cairns beach 'is here to stay'
  • Study links early Aussie tattoos to rock art
  • 'Eating locally produced food will cut carbon footprint'
  • Britney plays nice with paparazzo ex to get sex tape
  • Brush your teeth for a successful love life!
  • Guantanamo prisoners could soon be on US streets
    Get Australian Herald headlines emailed to you daily.

     RSS Directory

    Aussie bosses feel the need for pre-nups for office romances
    Australian Herald
    Monday 12th May, 2008  
    (ANI)


    Melbourne, May 12 : With budding office romances, bosses Down Under are making sure that they don't get caught in the crossfire if a relationship goes bust - by asking couples to sign a 'workplace pre-nup'.

    Employees are increasingly being asked to sign "love contracts" instead of Australian workplace agreements (AWAs).

    While talking to the US website ABCNews, employment lawyer Stephen Tedesco said that when a new romance begins at the workplace, there is a need to protect employers from claims of sexual harassment.

    "It is documenting the relationship. You need to define the relationship. Is (it) welcome? It is not sex harassment. It also defines how they are going to conduct themselves in the workplace going forward," News.com.au quoted Tedesco, as sayinig.

    Tory Johnson, careers expert was reported as saying that this agreement should be considered by workers as a pre-nuptial agreement for the workplace.

    "You're getting married. Someone basically (is) saying, 'We're happy. We hope it rules out. If it doesn't, we know what the rules will be'," she said.

    She added: "In this particular case, you're saying to the employer, 'We'll prevent you from being held responsible for employment issues in the event of a failed personal relationship.' The employer should not have that burden."

      Email this story to a friend

    Have your say on this story

    Your nickname (optional)
    Message
    Image verification This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)
    (enter the verification code from the image above)